<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAMA&#8217;s valuation model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/</link>
	<description>Coverage of Irish Politics, News and Current Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Election &#187; New NAMA regulations published</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/comment-page-1/#comment-124115</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Election &#187; New NAMA regulations published</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=10470#comment-124115</guid>
		<description>[...] we had noted before that the previous regulations had set a highly favourable discount rate for the treatment of future cash flows from bank assets.   This has been modified.  The new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we had noted before that the previous regulations had set a highly favourable discount rate for the treatment of future cash flows from bank assets.   This has been modified.  The new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Election &#124; credit crunch smile.com</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/comment-page-1/#comment-123291</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Election &#124; credit crunch smile.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=10470#comment-123291</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this article: Irish Election [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this article: Irish Election [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OisinOR</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/comment-page-1/#comment-123290</link>
		<dc:creator>OisinOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=10470#comment-123290</guid>
		<description>P O&#039;Neill, I&#039;m sure the document is full of archaic terminology, the fact that its come from the Dept. of Finance on the 23rd is a testament to their attempt to bury the story even further, not to mention the barrier to decode what it actually says.

I expect nothing more from a Government who would only allow 120hours of debate on the NAMA legislation in Dáil Éireann.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P O&#8217;Neill, I&#8217;m sure the document is full of archaic terminology, the fact that its come from the Dept. of Finance on the 23rd is a testament to their attempt to bury the story even further, not to mention the barrier to decode what it actually says.</p>
<p>I expect nothing more from a Government who would only allow 120hours of debate on the NAMA legislation in Dáil Éireann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/comment-page-1/#comment-123288</link>
		<dc:creator>P O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=10470#comment-123288</guid>
		<description>Oisin, it doesn&#039;t help that the document uses very confusing terminology.  There is another place in the document where they appear to set the discount rate at 3% which would even crazier but on 2nd reading I decided that is a &quot;haircut&quot; they apply to whatever answer that LTEV comes up with to cover some of their own costs.

But to spring this on 23 December is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oisin, it doesn&#8217;t help that the document uses very confusing terminology.  There is another place in the document where they appear to set the discount rate at 3% which would even crazier but on 2nd reading I decided that is a &#8220;haircut&#8221; they apply to whatever answer that LTEV comes up with to cover some of their own costs.</p>
<p>But to spring this on 23 December is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OisinOR</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2009/12/namas-valuation-model/comment-page-1/#comment-123287</link>
		<dc:creator>OisinOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=10470#comment-123287</guid>
		<description>Your quick calculation gives a haircut of 40% on the value ... somehow I don&#039;t think its going to work out that well for us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your quick calculation gives a haircut of 40% on the value &#8230; somehow I don&#8217;t think its going to work out that well for us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

