<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the headline &#8211; The Treaty Con</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/</link>
	<description>Coverage of Irish Politics, News and Current Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irish Election » Behind the headline - The Treaty Con &#124; France Today</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-119425</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Election » Behind the headline - The Treaty Con &#124; France Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-119425</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from: Irish Election » Behind the headline - The Treaty Con [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from: Irish Election » Behind the headline &#8211; The Treaty Con [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisbon ratification crisis escalates &#124; afoe &#124; A Fistful of Euros &#124; European Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-69624</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisbon ratification crisis escalates &#124; afoe &#124; A Fistful of Euros &#124; European Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-69624</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting to recall that a leaked British memo from a few months ago revealed that the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs had always viewed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting to recall that a leaked British memo from a few months ago revealed that the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs had always viewed the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronica</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-64106</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-64106</guid>
		<description>Oh dear! On a general point I think we all have to be concerned at the way in which trivia are blown out of all proportion in the heat of a political moment to provide dramatic &#039;conspiracy theory&#039; headlines or further unsettle those who are easily panicked anyway. There&#039;s always an agenda at work in the background. US politics is riven with this sort of thing, as exemplified in the current Presidential Democratic primaries, to the extent that the candidates, their spokespersons, advisers and cheerleaders might all be well-advised to say nothing about anything to anybody for the remaining duration of the contest and instead confine themselves to a couple of statements on how they propose to deal with the substantive issues and then leave it to the electorate to make up their own minds. 

Personally, I don&#039;t think that a routine memo drawn up by a Foreign Office official in Dublin on political thinking here on any issues of the day is something to get overly excited about or attach too much significance to. It&#039;s part of the official&#039;s job to submit these reports and he/she has to write something for the bosses. P. O&#039;Neill&#039;s point above  about the &#039;Duirt bean liom...&#039; nature of some diplomatic memos is very well-made.

In a previous lifetime, so to speak, I had some experience of how these memos are sometimes compiled. I recall one incident where an official, whose propensity to see mountains where there were only molehills was legendary,  advised me that something &#039;very serious&#039; was being contemplated on the Irish side on an issue that was of interest to me at the time. When I contacted the person whom I assumed to be the most likely source of all the excitement and angst by now spreading out in all directions, my suspicions were confirmed. &quot;Ah, yes of course,&quot; my source said mischievously, making no effort to hide his own amusement. &quot;Sure we&#039;re always telling that guy stuff like that, just to wind him up!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear! On a general point I think we all have to be concerned at the way in which trivia are blown out of all proportion in the heat of a political moment to provide dramatic &#8216;conspiracy theory&#8217; headlines or further unsettle those who are easily panicked anyway. There&#8217;s always an agenda at work in the background. US politics is riven with this sort of thing, as exemplified in the current Presidential Democratic primaries, to the extent that the candidates, their spokespersons, advisers and cheerleaders might all be well-advised to say nothing about anything to anybody for the remaining duration of the contest and instead confine themselves to a couple of statements on how they propose to deal with the substantive issues and then leave it to the electorate to make up their own minds. </p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think that a routine memo drawn up by a Foreign Office official in Dublin on political thinking here on any issues of the day is something to get overly excited about or attach too much significance to. It&#8217;s part of the official&#8217;s job to submit these reports and he/she has to write something for the bosses. P. O&#8217;Neill&#8217;s point above  about the &#8216;Duirt bean liom&#8230;&#8217; nature of some diplomatic memos is very well-made.</p>
<p>In a previous lifetime, so to speak, I had some experience of how these memos are sometimes compiled. I recall one incident where an official, whose propensity to see mountains where there were only molehills was legendary,  advised me that something &#8216;very serious&#8217; was being contemplated on the Irish side on an issue that was of interest to me at the time. When I contacted the person whom I assumed to be the most likely source of all the excitement and angst by now spreading out in all directions, my suspicions were confirmed. &#8220;Ah, yes of course,&#8221; my source said mischievously, making no effort to hide his own amusement. &#8220;Sure we&#8217;re always telling that guy stuff like that, just to wind him up!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Worth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Irish referendum - not at all surprising</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-64095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Worth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Irish referendum - not at all surprising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-64095</guid>
		<description>[...] [UPDATE] There&#8217;s a good analysis of this story from the Irish Election blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [UPDATE] There&#8217;s a good analysis of this story from the Irish Election blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-64092</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-64092</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s Irish Times has a text which is almost the same as that in the Open Europe blog, i.e. just as garbled..... Looks like a deliberate leak to me, from Foreign Affairs?? It might also have come from EU office, or from London (Daily Mail link??).

I think that your criticism of Libertas is misplaced, there was obviously some sort of text produced by someone, probably for UK consumption. I have no brief for Libertas per se, but at least they are trying to start a debate. The govt line is to minimise debate and minimise any &#039;noise&#039; around the referendum. They wish they didn&#039;t have to hold one. They&#039;ll do anything to avoid the shit of a no vote.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Irish Times has a text which is almost the same as that in the Open Europe blog, i.e. just as garbled&#8230;.. Looks like a deliberate leak to me, from Foreign Affairs?? It might also have come from EU office, or from London (Daily Mail link??).</p>
<p>I think that your criticism of Libertas is misplaced, there was obviously some sort of text produced by someone, probably for UK consumption. I have no brief for Libertas per se, but at least they are trying to start a debate. The govt line is to minimise debate and minimise any &#8216;noise&#8217; around the referendum. They wish they didn&#8217;t have to hold one. They&#8217;ll do anything to avoid the shit of a no vote&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-64084</link>
		<dc:creator>P O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-64084</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an odd parallel with the imbroglio that tripped up Barack Obama over a briefing that his economic adviser held with the Canadian consulate in Chicago about his trade policy; what leaked was not anything directly from the adviser but  the diplomat&#039;s briefing about it to the Canadian government.  Perhaps these briefings go round with a relatively wide circulation and are prone to being leaked.  But their second-hand nature leaves them subject to deniability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an odd parallel with the imbroglio that tripped up Barack Obama over a briefing that his economic adviser held with the Canadian consulate in Chicago about his trade policy; what leaked was not anything directly from the adviser but  the diplomat&#8217;s briefing about it to the Canadian government.  Perhaps these briefings go round with a relatively wide circulation and are prone to being leaked.  But their second-hand nature leaves them subject to deniability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy shaughnessy</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-64083</link>
		<dc:creator>andy shaughnessy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-64083</guid>
		<description>why has the governent not denied it so.
I dont agree with things the mail says about ireland but they are right about this. I&#039;ll believe them before id believe bertie ahern. after all hes the master of lies.
if they&#039;re agenda is to show up the treaty for what it is , whats wrong with that.
people are going to vote no because they can eventually  find the truth on the internet. they are no longer tied to the irish press which are inclined to be biased in favour
andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why has the governent not denied it so.<br />
I dont agree with things the mail says about ireland but they are right about this. I&#8217;ll believe them before id believe bertie ahern. after all hes the master of lies.<br />
if they&#8217;re agenda is to show up the treaty for what it is , whats wrong with that.<br />
people are going to vote no because they can eventually  find the truth on the internet. they are no longer tied to the irish press which are inclined to be biased in favour<br />
andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2008/04/behind-the-headline-the-treaty-con/comment-page-1/#comment-64079</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/?p=3058#comment-64079</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;By the way, anyone think that the Daily Mail might have an agenda here?&lt;/i&gt;

What are you implying here? The Daily Mail are known to be as pro-Europe as they are pro-Irish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>By the way, anyone think that the Daily Mail might have an agenda here?</i></p>
<p>What are you implying here? The Daily Mail are known to be as pro-Europe as they are pro-Irish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
