Comments on: Mobile Phone Masts

By: bb

bb — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:08:44 +0000

I totally agree man those masts are evil

By: Labours aversion to science | Irish Election

Labours aversion to science | Irish Election — Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:34:38 +0000

[...] very very simple. It is basic Physics inverse square law. (I have written about this before using a 10 meter high mast for calculations). Indeed the higher the mast the safer that would be. or the reasons outlined in my other post. [...]

By: Childern are vampires in Leinster | Irish Election

Childern are vampires in Leinster | Irish Election — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:14:58 +0000

[...] of electromagnetic radiation from about 300 nm to 800nm in wavelength. This is a bit like to whole mobile phone masts thing again (all be it less crazy). There is very little research on this to prove a link leukaemia in children [...]

By: The future for Irish Farming. | Irish Election

The future for Irish Farming. | Irish Election — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:30:36 +0000

[...] phone masts are safe. I have posted the reason here before it is basic physics. However hear the word radiation and people think Chernobyl and think of radiation burns they have [...]

By: Leaving Cert Math | Irish Election

Leaving Cert Math | Irish Election — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:46:17 +0000

[...] people Math and Science are hard and there is no way around this. But the fact that people believe mobile masts are dangerous shows that this is a pity. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where [...]

By: john

john — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:29:56 +0000

your arrogance and contempt is breathtaking.
i too was for this new technology until it made me sick.

the government likes to quote the WHO and the ICNIRP, both are laughably corrupt. mike repacholi (head of radiation research for the WHO)
was forced to resign when it emerged he had recieve over a hundred thousand dollars from mobile operators.
he now works as consultant ( i.e peddlar of lies) to local government advocating these masts in america.

By: mollie malone

mollie malone — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:05:48 +0000

Those companies who have received a licence from the state to operate a mobile phone company are entitled to get permission to erect masts, but, those who fear these masts are entitled to speak as they feel. Youre right,this is democracy, just like there was a candidate to legalise
cannabis – mightnt have been a “burning issue”with a lot of people -but what the hell….

when you look at some of the other candidates you wonder have they any issue,other than to get elected

By: Keith

Keith — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:42:17 +0000

Bang on, Simon. Glad to see someone using science rather than electioneering on this issue!

By: Bernie Goldbach

Bernie Goldbach — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:25:06 +0000

In the interest of balanced reporting, perhaps you should point to Brian Greene’s work at http://www.briangreene.com/blog/2005/03/baldoyle-mast-removal.html and several other posts that question the need to replicate or overlap mast coverage patterns.