Contact

Should we be covering something? Email us your ideas, rumours or comments.

Mobile Phone Masts

Read more about: Health, Tipperary North

Democracy, isn’t it great! It allows all types of people to run for election, whether they are right or wrong. Take this for example: last week’s Nenagh Guardian (Free reg.) reports that

A group lobbying against the erection of mobile phone masts are considering running a candidate in North Tipperary in next year’s General Election.

The group, known as B.E.S.T. (Better Environmental & Safer Telecommunications), held a meeting in the Abbey Court Hotel in Nenagh on Saturday last to discuss running candidates in a number of constituencies.

Now firstly, I would like to state all the scientific evidence that supports the belief of some people that mobile masts harm people.

As you can see from the above list, there is massive amounts of data to support this claim and as you can see, I have linked to no studies because, well, there are no studies, certainly none that I can find from good sources, but if anyone can point me to one, please do. I could say that this
rise in anti-mobile masts groups is due poor science education in the country, especially physics, but however true that might be, it is a cheap shot.

There has been numerous studies done that have not been able to prove any connection. And the basic reason is this: the inverse square law.

I = \frac{P}{A} = \frac{P}{4 \pi r^2}.

I is the intensity, P is the power, and r is the distance from the mast. Basically, the power decreases by r^2, so the further away from the mast you are, the lower the intensity. And this value decreases rapidly. The average mast would be, let’s say, ten meters high. That means the intensity at the bottom of the mast has dropped by a factor of 100. (Technically there would be no signal at the bottom of the mast as the angle of output means a few meters around the mast get no power anyway.) Now, a mobile mast has maximum of sixteen channels but apparently four is typical, but let’s take sixteen. Now, each channel is going to be connected to a phone, so that a mobile phone is going to broadcasting a signal equal to the power being sent to the mast. So basically the power that your mobile phone emits is going to be at a maximum 1/16 of the power of the base station. So for you to get more microwave energy from the phone mast at full power that you are standing under when you phone, your phone would have to be about 6 meters from you.

How close is your phone from you right now? How many other phones are also within 6 meters of you? Are you right beside a mobile mast?

But I suppose that does not matter. Masts look dangerous, microwave radiation has the word “radiation” in it, and people use words like cumlative dose which sounds technical so people believe it. And when do we let facts get in the way of a good scare story?

Update A mast in Limerick is also causing problems as it is 100 meters from a school. At 1 hundred meters  the power is down my a factor of 10,000 or tge same power as a mobile at a rough estimate 25 meters.

Share and Enjoy:
  • digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Furl
  • blogmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Linkter
  • Spurl
  • NewsVine
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • TailRank

9 Responses to “Mobile Phone Masts”

  1. # Comment by Bernie Goldbach Oct 27th, 2006 12:10

    In the interest of balanced reporting, perhaps you should point to Brian Greene’s work at http://www.briangreene.com/blog/2005/03/baldoyle-mast-removal.html and several other posts that question the need to replicate or overlap mast coverage patterns.

  2. # Comment by Keith Oct 27th, 2006 14:10

    Bang on, Simon. Glad to see someone using science rather than electioneering on this issue!

  3. # Comment by mollie malone Oct 28th, 2006 13:10

    Those companies who have received a licence from the state to operate a mobile phone company are entitled to get permission to erect masts, but, those who fear these masts are entitled to speak as they feel. Youre right,this is democracy, just like there was a candidate to legalise
    cannabis – mightnt have been a “burning issue”with a lot of people -but what the hell….

    when you look at some of the other candidates you wonder have they any issue,other than to get elected

  4. # Comment by john Feb 10th, 2007 01:02

    your arrogance and contempt is breathtaking.
    i too was for this new technology until it made me sick.

    the government likes to quote the WHO and the ICNIRP, both are laughably corrupt. mike repacholi (head of radiation research for the WHO)
    was forced to resign when it emerged he had recieve over a hundred thousand dollars from mobile operators.
    he now works as consultant ( i.e peddlar of lies) to local government advocating these masts in america.

  5. # Comment by bb Jun 10th, 2009 14:06

    I totally agree man those masts are evil

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Aug 15th, 2007
  2. Sep 30th, 2007
  3. Oct 22nd, 2007
  4. Nov 16th, 2007

Post a comment below:

Get Irish Election updates via email. Enter your email address:

Latest Links of Interest

Links Feed Links Archives »