<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking Turkey: Winning Seats in 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irishelection.com/2006/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2006/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/</link>
	<description>Coverage of Irish Politics, News and Current Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Did Sinn Fein go Wrong in This Election? at Irish Election</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2006/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-51125</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Did Sinn Fein go Wrong in This Election? at Irish Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/#comment-51125</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned a long time ago that I thought this strategy would help to break up the huge cross-class vote structure which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned a long time ago that I thought this strategy would help to break up the huge cross-class vote structure which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Debate Needed at Irish Election</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2006/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-8144</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Debate Needed at Irish Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/#comment-8144</guid>
		<description>[...] Fianna Fail are in principle pro-everything. Depending on who is calling for it, how loudly they do it and what stage of the electoral cycle it is, they are willing to carry out a great deal. This stems from a beneficial cross-class vote, one assiduously cultivated by appealing to the average voter. The effect of this has been that other parties ape the successful animal in the jungle and attempt to cultivate a cross-class vote. I&#8217;ve written about this before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fianna Fail are in principle pro-everything. Depending on who is calling for it, how loudly they do it and what stage of the electoral cycle it is, they are willing to carry out a great deal. This stems from a beneficial cross-class vote, one assiduously cultivated by appealing to the average voter. The effect of this has been that other parties ape the successful animal in the jungle and attempt to cultivate a cross-class vote. I&#8217;ve written about this before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.irishelection.com/2006/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishelection.com/09/talking-turkey-winning-seats-in-2007/#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>I agree with the benefits of specifity for the newer parties. 

I would make one point which I&#039;ve written about more over on p.ie which is that people forget that Fianna Fail was formed as an opposition party and their policies and support was necessarily drawn from those disappointed by the Cumann na nGaedhael government. So taking one example of this small farmers, farm labourers and others disappointed by the general lack of land reform in the 1920s found a home in FF. This in turn meant that Cumann na nGaedhael and subsequently Fine Gael got support from the larger farmers. It is not that CnG or FG started out to protect the larger farmers of electoral reasons, rather that they were unable to deliver on land reform in the manner that many people had come to expect. And so they ended up with the support of larger farmers by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the benefits of specifity for the newer parties. </p>
<p>I would make one point which I&#8217;ve written about more over on p.ie which is that people forget that Fianna Fail was formed as an opposition party and their policies and support was necessarily drawn from those disappointed by the Cumann na nGaedhael government. So taking one example of this small farmers, farm labourers and others disappointed by the general lack of land reform in the 1920s found a home in FF. This in turn meant that Cumann na nGaedhael and subsequently Fine Gael got support from the larger farmers. It is not that CnG or FG started out to protect the larger farmers of electoral reasons, rather that they were unable to deliver on land reform in the manner that many people had come to expect. And so they ended up with the support of larger farmers by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

