Contact

Should we be covering something? Email us your ideas, rumours or comments.

Interview With John Gormley

Read more about: Green Party, Interviews     Print This Post

And yes I was hoping for a little more engagement

John Gormley thanks for agreeing to talk to us;

IE.com: The Green Party are enjoying 7% support in the polls and the national agenda currently seems to suit them (sustainable energy, public transport etc.) What are Greens looking for at the next election? Is there a potential for seat gains as voters move away from the established parties?

JG: Yes, we feel we can make modest gains in targeted areas. All we’re saying at this stage is that we’ll come back with 6 plus seats.

IE.com: Your stance on Iraq and Shannon is widely known, however do you think that the electorate would benefit, or engage, with a debate on foreign policy at the next election? Should we be looking to discuss neutrality, Iraq, EU Battle Groups and the UN alongside the health service, taxes etc?

JG: I can honestly say that these issues don’t come up on the doors, even though they are a particular interest of mine.

IE.com: In light of Labour’s perceived move to the centre ground and alliance with Fine Gael, should an alternative government be about social justice or the sound management of individuals finances?

JG: It has to be about social justice and quality of life

IE.com: When we see how few votes that government minsters (McDaid) and backbenchers (Wallace) need to attend to govern the country, is it not time that hte Dail was reformed and we lived up to our title as a republic?

JG: The Dail is in urgent need of reform. We have put forward a policy document on this.

IE.com: Who looks likely to be the biggest losers at the next election?

JG:Hard to say.It’s a year away. Things change rapidly in this business. Obviously, it would be nice if the government parties lost out.

IE.com: What have the Green Party got to offer the country in government that Labour, Fine Fail, the PDs and Fine Gael do not?

JG: Radical, common sense solutions. Courage to take on the vested interests.

IE.com: The major commitments on your 50 Steps are still to be released, but just a quick few questions-is it the state’s responsibility to build schools? Or to continue to finance private operators to run schools as currently? Can our current models of education match the lifestyles of parents and the needs of children in years to come? If not what needs to be addressed at a fundamental level?

JG: Yes, the state has a central role in education, and no, funding private schools is not the right approach.

IE.com: Should the current pay talks yield bonus pay to workers or should we be quite worried about inflation and loss of competitiveness in a globalised economy? Should the issue of globalisation and job migration come up in 2007 or is it an issue at all? Is it not just the natural pattern of economic growth?

JG: These issues will come up. The perceived race to the bottom is a matter of concern for workers. As for economic growth , well, it’s time this was the subject of real debate

Share and Enjoy:
  • digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Furl
  • blogmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Linkter
  • Spurl
  • NewsVine
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • TailRank

11 Responses to “Interview With John Gormley”

  1. # Comment by Keith May 29th, 2006 14:05

    Wow John, try to keep your answers a bit shorter and more to the point ;-)

  2. # Comment by Cian May 29th, 2006 14:05

    taking the internet seriously.
    You can only imagine my response on reading the email-non printable even in the uncesored world of the interweb!!

  3. # Comment by Simon May 29th, 2006 14:05

    oh dear.
    It is nice to see the green party are engaging with the voters. :roll:

  4. # Comment by Ryan Meade May 30th, 2006 12:05

    I think John probably missed the comment in your email “to be as long as you like” – normally these Q&As call for brief responses. However, if your reaction to his email was so negative, I think it would have been appropriate to let John know this before publication. I’m sure he would have been willing to flesh out his answers.

  5. # Comment by Cian May 30th, 2006 13:05

    fair comment, i can resend if you would like to rewrite it.

  6. # Comment by Dan Sullivan May 30th, 2006 17:05

    Ryan, did you or John give the answers?

  7. # Comment by Frank May 30th, 2006 19:05

    ‘non printable even in the uncesored world of the interweb!!

    It might help Deputy Gormley’s re-election prospects if his allegedly unprintable e-mail were to be published in full here now :-)

  8. # Comment by Cian May 31st, 2006 01:05

    ha, no Frank i meant my response to the mail was pretty bad. The email itself was reprinted in full above.

  9. # Comment by Keith May 31st, 2006 11:05

    As Ryan probably hasn’t seen your question yet, I can confirm that he’s told me that John replied to the email, not Ryan (so no blaming it on the spin-doctors!).

  10. # Comment by Frank May 31st, 2006 21:05

    Too busy making up with Bertie after the gratuitously disparaging L’Oreal attack.

    An Taoiseach came back well against the muesli and sandals brigade a day or two later when he pointed out that roads objectors were adding to traffic delays and road deaths in the Meath commuter belt.

  11. # Comment by Ryan Meade Jun 1st, 2006 12:06

    Yes, John replied to the questions himself, I’m sure I would have added lots more waffle and more cut-and-paste from policy documents!

Post a comment below:

Get Irish Election updates via email. Enter your email address: