Contact

Should we be covering something? Email us your ideas, rumours or comments.

Censorship

Read more about: Social Policy

Anabolic Initiations No. 5 is not a film you would think says a lot about Ireland today. The synoposis of the film on mentions the words ass, cum, sluts etc etc. Yet this film says more about Ireland today then any film starring that twit from the Frames.

A case has been taken by a owner of an adult shop against the film censors board for the banning of the film. Resulting in her not being able to sell the DVD. In this day an age it is a bit crazy. If you google the title which I did to get the synoposis the first link is to a shop selling it. (google it your selves). Considering that it can already be bought by someone, why does it make sense to force people who want to buy it to buy it where all the money is going out of the state. If it is going to be bought we might was well keep the money in the state.

But the other issue

The censor said in his decision that the work was unfit for viewing because it contained material that was “obscene or indecent” that would “deprave or corrupt persons who might view it”. 

Now who is the censor to tell a grown adult what are what will not corrupt the person. Why is this appointed to be our moral guardian? This DVD is of consenting adults it is not child porn. It is not showing illegal acts. (I haven’t watched it so can’t say for sure but I guess if it did that would have been the censors offices main argument.) We let people get blind drunk which “depraves and corrupts an awful lot of people” The point of the matter is, whether or not the government can say what people can or cannot do in their own homes (with in the normal confines of the law). It seems that we are on the cusps of social change in Ireland. The last vestiges of the Catholics church’s control on the minds of the people are holding on. It is time we let them go.

2 Responses to “Censorship”

  1. # Comment by Mark Waters Nov 15th, 2007 14:11

    The censor said in his decision that the work was unfit for viewing because it contained material that was “obscene or indecent” that would “deprave or corrupt persons who might view it”.

    We should lock up the censor. He must be a walking time bomb after viewing all that obscene and indecent material.

  2. # Comment by Keith Nov 15th, 2007 15:11

    “Now who is the censor to tell a grown adult what are what will not corrupt the person.”

    That’s what the law states (Video Recordings Act 1989):

    S3.1 The Official Censor shall, on application to him in relation to a video work, grant to the person making the application (referred to in this section as the applicant) a certificate (referred to in this Act as a supply certificate) declaring the work to be fit for viewing unless he is of opinion that the work is unfit for viewing because—
    (a) the viewing of it—

    (iii) - would tend, by reason of the inclusion in it of obscene or indecent matter, to deprave or corrupt persons who might view it,…

Post a comment below:

Get Irish Election updates via email. Enter your email address:

Latest Links of Interest

Links Feed Links Archives »