Irish Election are pleased to announce our collection of Irish 
Government introduces Apartheid
Read more about: Disabilities, Government, Housing, Irish Politics, Policy, Proverty, Social Policy
What you mean you missed it? Don’t worry so have a lot of people.
The Social Welfare and Pensions Bill 2007 is currently going through the Oireachtas. Contained in that bill is a clause that will mean that private developers in the many areas of Dublin will be able to tell buyers that nobody on social welfare is renting in the area where they are building.
How is that the case? Well in a few weeks it will be the law that any area under regeneration will not be accessible to anyone in receipt of rent supplement. The builders and the land owners seem to have done a deal so that they don’t have to provide housing for people even if the government are paying for it. The government tried to do this without introducing a law in Ballymun of all places a few years ago. Now they are making sure that this apartheid is legal.
In the bill as amended by the Dail and due to go before the Seanad the clause reads
Section 25
…..(3B) Subject to subsection (3C), a payment referred to in subsection (3) shall not be payable in respect of a person’s residence where his or her residence is situated in an area notified to the Minister by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government as being an area of regeneration for the purpose of providing for greater social integration.
An area of regeneration for the purpose of providing for greater social integration? How socially integrated will an area be if families on low incomes, older pople, people with disabilities and others entitled to rent supplements will not be able to live there??
If one lives in the area already and is receiving rent supplement then one should not be affected. However that too could change. And then as many already know finding a landlord who would take rent supplement was hard enough.
Therefore those who rely on the private rented sector for housing and receive supplement will be forced to live in areas where accommodation is not regenerated, where there is no real social mix, and where the government have not done deals with builders and private property owners to banish the poor.
So the affordable housing (20%) deal has been shown to be a load of rubbish with builders doing deals with councils to absolve themselves of their responsibilities, and now in areas where they rent out or own properties they will be able to say that those who could never afford to buy any house or apartment will not be renting their either.
Ah yes Bertie we can all see what the next step is!
Originally posted at Maman Poulet
If you had the slightest understanding of the nature and history of Apartheid you would not use it in such a throw away childish tantrum fashion.
John the practice of apartheid is A policy or practice of separating or segregating groups. - the word is not the property of the National Party and it’s regime in South Africa.
The Irish government are segregating groups by this act of social policy - and I challenge you to argue otherwise…
This is a strange one all right, but ostensibly the objective is indeed social integration, by moving higher-income residents into low-income areas alongside existing residents. However, I can’t see any justification for doing this by creating enclaves within these areas where people on rent supplement are specifically excluded.
I remember seeing that alright meant to post on it. But didn’t (I don’t think). But don’t forget there is many people who would like to live a social welfare free zone. It is not entirely the developers fault. If there was no monetary advantage to it they would not do it. The advantage comes from people willing to pay more to live in “exclusive areas”
It is quiet shocking and shocking how little coverage it is getting