Contact

Should we be covering something? Email us your ideas, rumours or comments.

Rural Nite Bus and random breath testing.

Read more about: Agriculture and Rural, Law, Transport

One of the big stories of the last few days is that Eamon O’Cuiv has announced that the state will subsidies public transport for people to go home from Rural pubs. Now there is a lot of up roar about it. About how it is an election stunt, subsidising drinking yadda yadda. But it is all bull.

First things first. Is it an election stunt. That is debatable not the fact that it is an election year and that facilitating people get pissed does not have election merit. The debate is that it is a stunt.

One of the arguments that I have heard is that it is subsidising drinking. But no one makes this argument about Nite Buses in Dublin. In fact people call for more NiteBuses. Here is the basic argument in favour of city Nite buses.

That if more buses were provided then more people would leave the city center faster. Thus not get in fights or attacked and causing increased number in casualty and thus saving the state money in A&E and making people and the city safer.

Now what is the difference between the argument for these nite buses. By giving people an option not to drive. They will not drive and thus will not drink and drive and crash into trees and walls. Thus saving the state money in A&E and making people and the country safer.

So why do we have two separate views on the issue of night buses when the argument for them is virtually the same argument.

Drink Driving happens. I am from a rural area and people do drink and drive. When you live 4 miles from the pub you have 2 options. No drink and drink. Now we could say the fact that we can’t do anything but drink  is terrible and it probably is. But it is a fact. And a fact we can’t simply ignore it is not going away. We are a people who love to get pissed, how much you drink is a sign of pride, how many times have you started a conversation with the line “I was so pissed last night”. People are not going to buy coke, have designated drivers etc they will just flout the law. We simply have to deal with it.

The simple fact is that people are going to drink and drive. They are going to crash and they are going to die. This measure is going to stop that. And how much would it actually cost. Take the cost of sending a fire engine and an ambulance and a squad car to a crash site add to that the cost of emergency surgery. Add to that the cost of staying in hospital recovering (if lucky) add to that the cost of physiotherapy. Compare this to a rural bus service subsidised but not free that also will result in more jobs in rural areas (pub staff and bus drivers) and it very quickly does not look that expensive.

As for the measure that is bring this about the random breath testing. Now much critism has been placed on the fact that the random breath testing happens not only at night when the most accidents happen. But also on a Sunday morning when people are on the way to mass. Now it would make sense to just deploy Gardai at night time as it is the time of maximum accidents. But one thing that testing in the morning does. Is that is puts the fear of god in to people. It makes them think the testers are even more devious and out to get people it makes people more afraid of drinking to excess.

 

3 Responses to “Rural Nite Bus and random breath testing.”

  1. # Comment by Rant Jan 11th, 2007 14:01

    Simon,
    I’m really pissed that this issue is getting any air time at all. It is more of an election issue red herring than a stunt. The Government must be delighted that this non-party issue will whip up the media and electorate in a whirlwind of comment and fervour and detract focus from the long list of glaring inadequacies which they have presided over (and I won’t begin to list them as I don’t have all day). If you were a Gov TD door stepping over the next few months would you prefer to be slated with real issues such as class sizes and school accommodation, crime figures, the cost of living or the squandered public finances over the past 10 years. I know I promised not to list the shortcomings so sue me they are worth repeating and repeating so that they are kept in the forefront of electorates’ minds. I text’d and emailed the Newstalk breakfast show this morning to make this similar point as they were gloating over their exclusive survey revealing that 4 out of 10 TD’s did not agree with the random breathalyser tests being executed the morning after. They did not have the cajones to read either preferring instead to bolster their own ego falsely on what is truly a non story.

    Rant …

  2. # Comment by Niall Jan 11th, 2007 18:01

    Hmmm. I wonder just what they mean by rural. I was watching TV3 news the other night (yeah I know) and they had an item on about how a publican in Ballymote was closing because of random breath testing. The thing about Ballymote is that it isn’t really all that rural. It’s a small town, but not a village.

    When they say that there will be subsidised transport for people going home from rural pubs, do they mean places like Ballymote. Because a place like that already has private buses and taxis doing that kind of thing. It really wouldn’t make that much of a difference.

    Now if they were interested in doing this sort of thing with actual rural pubs, places that taxis refuse to service (at least until 5am after the nightclub runs have been finished) then that would be interesting. But those areas don’t have any public transport to begin with, so subsidising public transport will not help at all.

  3. # Comment by Adam Maguire Jan 11th, 2007 19:01

    I have no problem with subsidised travel for people to get to and from pubs, as long as a) it’s not free for passengers b) the service is designed to make a profit a la CIE and c) it’s state owned (so all profits return to the public coffers).
    It’s only under these conditions that you can compare the State transport companies with this initiative. If real privatisation does occour in the transport market then the 3rd condition wouldn’t apply as much, but that’s not happening any time soon.

    I also find it enraging that the State is willing to put any kind of money into shipping people to and from pubs when [b]all[/b] State-owned transport, which is supposed to ship people to and from their jobs (ye know, that part of everyday life that’s mildly important to the economy), is inadequate and in some places non-existant.

Post a comment below:

Get Irish Election updates via email. Enter your email address:

Latest Links of Interest

Links Feed Links Archives »